McGivney v. Mulrooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGivney v. Mulrooney

233 A.D. 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 867 (McGivney v. Mulrooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGivney v. Mulrooney, 233 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for alternative mandamus order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the record shows that the petitioner has no clear legal right to such relief but must seek his remedy through some other action or proceeding. Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the motion upon the ground that the appellant did not resign.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for alternative mandamus order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the record shows that the petitioner has no clear legal right to such relief but must seek his remedy through some other action or proceeding. Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the motion upon the ground that the appellant did not resign.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgivney-v-mulrooney-nyappdiv-1931.