McGinsey v. State
This text of 132 S.W. 773 (McGinsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of robbery and given forty-one years in the penitentiary.
Appellant raises a question that necessitates the reversal and dismissal of the prosecution. The indictment alleges the offense to have been committed on the 29th day of February, 1910. This is an impossible date and is not therefore a sufficient allegation of time. The statute requires that there shall be some particular date mentioned. In the case of Stephens v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 406, this precise question came before us and it was held that the indictment was not sufficient. The indictment in the Stephens case charged the offense to have been committed on June 31, 1906. The indictment was held insufficient. The authorities are collated in the Stephens case. In the Barnes case, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 297, the indictment charged that the offense was committed on or about the - day of -, A. D. 1900. That was held fatally defective.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 S.W. 773, 60 Tex. Crim. 505, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginsey-v-state-texcrimapp-1910.