McGinnis v. Smith
116 S.E.2d 177, 253 N.C. 70, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 458
Opinion
The admission by defendant driver of a violation of G.S. 20-152 (a) is sufficient to require jury determination of the question of actionable negligence. The evidence with respect to contributory negligence is sufficient to permit but not compel an affirmative answer to that issue raised by the pleadings.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGinnis v. Smith, 116 S.E.2d 177, 253 N.C. 70, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 458 (N.C. 1960).
116 S.E.2d 177 (McGinnis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Bruce
128 S.E.2d 561 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)