McGinnis v. Royster

406 U.S. 955, 92 S. Ct. 2057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McGinnis v. Royster. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 U.S. 263
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 30, 1972·No. No. 71-718·Published

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 405 U. S. 986.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that James J. McDonough, Esquire, and Matthew Muraskin, Esquire, of Mineóla, New York, be, and they are hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for appellees in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGinnis v. Royster, 406 U.S. 955, 92 S. Ct. 2057 (1972).

406 U.S. 955 (McGinnis v. Royster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.