McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54

182 N.C. 770
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 26, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

Some serious and weighty questions of law are presented by the demurrer and the several motions filed in the cause;, but we deem it'unnecessary to pass upon them now, as we are convinced, from a perusal of the record, that the evidence adduced and offered on the hearing was not sufficient to warrant a continuance of the injunction. It will, therefore, be dissolved without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54, 182 N.C. 770 (N.C. 1921).

182 N.C. 770 (McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263
121 S.E. 31 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)