McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54

Supreme Court of North Carolina

McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54

182 N.C. 770

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 26, 1921

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 N.C. 770 (McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGinnis v. Raleigh Typographical Union, No. 54, 182 N.C. 770 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

Some serious and weighty questions of law are presented by the demurrer and the several motions filed in the cause;, but we deem it'unnecessary to pass upon them now, as we are convinced, from a perusal of the record, that the evidence adduced and offered on the hearing was not sufficient to warrant a continuance of the injunction. It will, therefore, be dissolved without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oubiam.

Some serious and weighty questions of law are presented by the demurrer and the several motions filed in the cause;, but we deem it'unnecessary to pass upon them now, as we are convinced, from a perusal of the record, that the evidence adduced and offered on the hearing was not sufficient to warrant a continuance of the injunction. It will, therefore, be dissolved without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties.

Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 N.C. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginnis-v-raleigh-typographical-union-no-54-nc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack