McGinnis v. Irwin
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
LEA MICHELLE MCGINNIS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-4192
MATTHEW IRWIN,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed January 19, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, John D. Galluzzo, Judge.
Richard J. Feinberg, of Law Office of Richard J. Feinberg, Indialantic, for Appellant.
Jonathan R. Simon, of The Orlando Family Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in all respects except the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion
for attorney’s fees. On remand, the lower court shall make findings of fact regarding
Appellant’s need and Appellee’s ability to pay fees and award such fees as are warranted
based on those findings. See Henderson v. Henderson, 162 So. 3d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2015).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGinnis v. Irwin (McGinnis v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.