McGinnis v. Irwin
This text of McGinnis v. Irwin (McGinnis v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
LEA MICHELLE MCGINNIS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-4192
MATTHEW IRWIN,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed January 19, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, John D. Galluzzo, Judge.
Richard J. Feinberg, of Law Office of Richard J. Feinberg, Indialantic, for Appellant.
Jonathan R. Simon, of The Orlando Family Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in all respects except the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion
for attorney’s fees. On remand, the lower court shall make findings of fact regarding
Appellant’s need and Appellee’s ability to pay fees and award such fees as are warranted
based on those findings. See Henderson v. Henderson, 162 So. 3d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2015).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McGinnis v. Irwin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginnis-v-irwin-fladistctapp-2018.