McGinnis v. Chrysler Corp.
883 S.W.2d 113, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1441, 1994 WL 493976
Opinion
ORDER
Claimant appeals from the decision of the Commission denying him workers’ compensation benefits for his occupational disease claim. We affirm. The Commission’s findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(4) and (5).
We find a written opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGinnis v. Chrysler Corp., 883 S.W.2d 113, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1441, 1994 WL 493976 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
883 S.W.2d 113 (McGinnis v. Chrysler Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.