McGinnis, Barbara v. Range Line Discount Deli

2021 TN WC 168
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 26, 2021
Docket2019-08-1005
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 TN WC 168 (McGinnis, Barbara v. Range Line Discount Deli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGinnis, Barbara v. Range Line Discount Deli, 2021 TN WC 168 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

FILED Mar 26, 2021 12:03 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

BARBARA McGINNIS, ) Docket No. 2019-08-1005 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 94206-2019 RANGE LINE DISCOUNT DELI, ) Uninsured Employer. ) Judge Amber Luttrell

COMPENSATION ORDER

The Court held a Compensation Hearing on March 4, 2021, on Ms. McGinnis’s request for permanent partial disability, temporary disability, and past medical expenses. Range Line Discount Deli did not appear or participate in this case. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. McGinnis proved she is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits totaling $57,600 and future medical benefits, but she is not entitled to temporary disability or past medical expenses.

History of Claim

Ms. McGinnis worked as a cook for Range Line Discount Deli. On July 20, 2019, she injured her back, neck, and right side of her body when she tripped over a piece of aluminum, slipped in water, and fell to the floor at work.

Ms. McGinnis reported the injury, but Range Line did not provide authorized treatment. Therefore, Ms. McGinnis sought emergency treatment at Methodist Hospital for her injuries. The physician took x-rays, prescribed medication, and released her to follow up with her personal physician.

Several months later, Ms. McGinnis sought further treatment at Regional One Health for ongoing symptoms in her neck, right shoulder, back, and right foot, which she related to her fall at work.1 She received conservative treatment from Dr. Christopher 1 Ms. McGinnis stated she was unable to obtain a follow-up appointment with her personal physicians for several months.

1 Jackson throughout 2019 and 2020 for chronic back, neck, and right-shoulder pain. She also sought acupuncture treatment for her back with Jian Yan, LAc.

In August of 2020, Dr. Jackson reviewed thoracic and lumber MRIs and explained to Ms. McGinnis that they showed multiple areas of disc bulge without spinal cord impingement. They discussed initiating a long-term opioid treatment contract with plans to initiate tramadol for her back pain.2

In his C-32 Standard Form Medical Report, Dr. Jackson noted Ms. McGinnis’s thoracic and lumbar back pain. He noted her injury was “disc protrusion on MRI” from Ms. McGinnis’s slip and fall at work. He stated the injury resulted in the need for treatment and resulted in disablement. He further concluded that her employment, more likely than not, was primarily responsible for her injury or need for treatment. Regarding maximum medical improvement, Dr. Jackson noted that the date was “unclear” but stated “she has improved as of my visit on January 15, 2021.” He assigned a 50% permanent impairment to the body as a whole.

Ms. McGinnis introduced medical bills from the City of Memphis EMT Services, Methodist Hospital, Regional One Health (Drs. Sethi and Jackson), Memphis Radiology, and One Clinic Express (Jian Yan, Lac).

After Range Line declined to provide benefits, Ms. McGinnis filed a Petition for Benefit Determination, and the Bureau initiated an investigation. A compliance specialist’s report found that Range Line is owned by Nabil Haimed. The specialist interviewed Ms. McGinnis; Nassar, one of Mr. Haimed’s sons who helped run the business; and “Big Ali,” another family member, who stated he was the manager. Big Ali said Range Line had a workers’ compensation policy, but he could not provide any proof of coverage. The specialist noted he found no policy for Range Line in NCCI, and Ms. McGinnis said she worked with seven other employees. Finally, the specialist confirmed Ms. McGinnis is a Tennessee resident and that she provided notice to the Bureau of her employer’s lack of coverage within sixty days of her injury.

After an Expedited Hearing, the Court ordered Range Line to provide a panel of physicians for treatment and held Ms. McGinnis satisfied the requirements of Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-801(d) to be eligible to request limited medical benefits from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund at the Administrator’s discretion.

Ms. McGinnis seeks permanent partial disability benefits, temporary disability benefits, and payment of her past medical bills. She testified her average weekly wage was $384 resulting in a compensation rate of $256.

2 Ms. McGinnis did not introduce any of Dr. Jackson’s records after the August 28, 2020 visit. 2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At a Compensation Hearing, Ms. McGinnis must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to the requested benefits. Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(c)(6) (2020).

To prove a compensable injury, Ms. McGinnis must show that her alleged injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. To do so, she must prove a work-related incident identifiable by time and place of occurrence. Further, she must show, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the incident contributed more than fifty percent in causing the disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes. A “reasonable degree of medical certainty” means that, in the treating physician’s opinion, it is more likely than not considering all causes as opposed to speculation or possibility. See generally Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A)-(D). Thus, causation must be proven by expert medical testimony.

Applying these principles, Ms. McGinnis’s undisputed testimony and the medical proof showed that she injured her back when she fell on July 20, 2019. Therefore, the Court holds she established a specific incident, identifiable by time and place of occurrence.

Further, the proof showed that Ms. McGinnis’s work injury resulted in the need for treatment and that the employment activity, more likely than not, was primarily responsible for the injury and need for treatment. She reached maximum medical improvement on January 15, 2021, and her injury resulted in 50% permanent impairment. Thus, based on Dr. Jackson’s opinions, the Court holds Ms. McGinnis’s back injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment and resulted in 50% permanent impairment to the whole person.

Accordingly, the Court holds Ms. McGinnis proved by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits totaling $57,600, which was calculated by multiplying 225 weeks by her compensation rate of $256. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(3)(A). Further, she is entitled to future medical benefits for her back injury with Dr. Jackson. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A).

Turning to Ms. McGinnis’s request for temporary disability benefits, Ms. McGinnis must show (1) she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, (2) a causal connection between that injury and her inability to work, and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). While Ms. McGinnis introduced medical records concerning her treatment for the work injury, she did not introduce any off-work notes or other evidence sufficient to satisfy these factors. Thus, her request for temporary disability benefits is denied.

3 Ms. McGinnis also requested payment of her medical bills. While Ms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)(A)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A)
§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(3)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(c)(7)
§ 50-6-801
Tennessee § 50-6-801(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 TN WC 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginnis-barbara-v-range-line-discount-deli-tennworkcompcl-2021.