McGinnis, Barbara v. RANGE LINE DISCOUNT DELI

2020 TN WC 108
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedOctober 8, 2020
Docket2019-08-1005
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 108 (McGinnis, Barbara v. RANGE LINE DISCOUNT DELI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGinnis, Barbara v. RANGE LINE DISCOUNT DELI, 2020 TN WC 108 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

FILED Oct 08, 2020 08:20 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

IN THE AT MEMPHIS

BARBARA McGINNIS, ) Docket No. 2019-08-1005 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 94206-2019 RANGE LINE DISCOUNT DELI, ) Uninsured Employer. ) Judge Amber Luttrell

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

for medical and temporary disability benefits. Range Line Discount Deli did not appear. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. McGinnis is entitled to a panel of physicians but is not entitled to the requested temporary disability benefits or payment of medical bills at this time.

History of Claim

Ms. McGinnis worked as a cook for Range Line Discount Deli. On July 20, 2019, she injured her right foot, right arm/shoulder, back, and right side of her body when she tripped over a piece of aluminum, slipped in water, and fell to the floor. Her coworker, LaKeith Jamerson, testified by affidavit that he witnessed the accident and assisted her afterward.

Ms. McGinnis went to the emergency room, but she did not produce records from that treatment. She stated the providers took x-rays and prescribed medication. She was unable to obtain a follow-up appointment with her personal physicians for several months.

According to the records, in October 2019, Ms. McGinnis saw Dr. Pooja Sethi and reported a history of her fall on July 20, among other health concerns. She complained of resulting pain in her neck, right shoulder, low back, and foot. She then saw Dr. Christopher Jackson throughout 2019 and 2020 for chronic back, neck, and right-shoulder pain.

Dr. Jackson ordered cervical, thoracic, and lumbar MRIs and treated Ms. McGinnis

1 conservatively for her symptoms. His records did not mention at work until August 28, 2020. At that visit, Dr. Jackson noted that four weeks before coming to the clinic, Ms. McGinnis suffered a fall that caused worsening neck and right-shoulder blade pain. Ms. McGinnis testified that Dr. Jackson is currently treating her for pain.

Ms. McGinnis also testified regarding the notice she provided Range Line and her efforts to file an accident report. Range Line is owned by Nabil Haimed, but his sons, Ali and Mohammed, help manage the business. Ms. McGinnis sent text messages to Ali and Mohammed requesting they fill out an accident report. Mohammed responded by text and attempted to dissuade her from filing a report. She also sent a text message to Mr. Haimed but received no response.

Ms. McGinnis then filed a Petition for Benefit Determination, and the Bureau initiated an investigation.1 A compliance specialist stated that the specialist interviewed Ms. McGinnis, Mr. Nassar, one of sons who helped run the business, and who stated he was the manager. Big Ali said but he could not provide any proof of coverage. The specialist noted he found no policy for Range Line in NCCI, and Ms. McGinnis said she worked with seven other employees. Finally, the specialist confirmed Ms. McGinnis is a Tennessee resident and that she provided notice to the Bureau of her days of her injury.

Ms. McGinnis seeks medical benefits, temporary disability benefits, payment of her outstanding medical bills and reimbursement for bills paid by her insurance.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. McGinnis must provide sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2019); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Compensability

To prove a compensable injury, Ms. McGinnis must show that her alleged injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. To do so, she must prove a work-related incident identifiable by time and place of occurrence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- that [the incident] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . degree

11 Ms. McGinnis advised the Court that she served a copy of her Petition for Benefit Determination on Range Line by mail.

2 it is more likely than not considering all causes as opposed to speculation or possibility. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(C)-(D).

Applying these principles, the Court finds the undisputed testimony from Ms. McGinnis and Mr. Jamerson proved that she injured her foot, right arm/shoulder, back and right side of her body when she fell on July 20, 2019. Therefore, the Court holds she is likely to show a specific incident, identifiable by time and place, at trial.

The question then is whether Ms. McGinnis appears likely to establish that her work primarily caused the injury and need for treatment. The Court cannot find at this time that she is likely to meet this burden. None of the medical records mention causation. Thus, she has not proven than fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . disablement or need for medical treatment,

However, the Court must also address failure to provide a panel of physicians. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i) provides that, when the employee has suffered an injury and expressed a need for medical care, the employer shall designate a group of three (3) or more independent reputable physicians . . . from which the injured employee shall select one (1) to be the tr also require an employer to provide a panel no later than three days after an employee expresses a need for medical care. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-01-.06 (2018).

Further, at an expedited hearing, an employee need not establish the compensability of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Rather, where the employee presents sufficient evidence to support that a work event resulted in injury, it may also be sufficient to support an order compelling an employer to provide a panel. See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 19, at *8-9 (Apr. 20, 2016). Thus, the question is whether Ms. McGinnis provided sufficient evidence to establish at this expedited hearing stage that she is entitled to a panel of physicians. Her undisputed testimony was that she suffered a specific injury, reported it to her employer, and attempted to file an accident report to seek benefits. The Court holds this is sufficient evidence to satisfy her burden at this stage that she is entitled to a panel of physicians. Range Line shall provide a panel from which Ms. McGinnis may choose an authorized physician for treatment of her alleged injuries. Temporary Disability and Medical Bills

To establish entitlement to temporary benefits, Ms. McGinnis must show (1) she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, (2) a causal connection between that injury and his inability to work, and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11,

3 2015). The Court finds Ms. McGinnis did not introduce sufficient evidence to satisfy these factors. Thus, her request for temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

Ms. McGinnis also requested payment of her medical bills for treatment of her alleged injury. However, she did not provide corresponding records for all of the bills, nor did she show that the expenses were causally related to the work injury or that the treatment was reasonable and necessary. Without an expert opinion, the Court cannot speculate as to the reasonableness, necessity, and causal relationship of the treatment and charges to the work injury. See Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 57, at *8- 9 (Sept.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)(C)
§ 50-6-801
Tennessee § 50-6-801(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginnis-barbara-v-range-line-discount-deli-tennworkcompcl-2020.