McGinley v. Hardy

California Supreme Court

McGinley v. Hardy

18 Cal. 115

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Cal. 115 (McGinley v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGinley v. Hardy, 18 Cal. 115 (Cal. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

‘Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Field, C. J. concurring.

We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Field, C. J. concurring.

We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Cal. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcginley-v-hardy-cal-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack