McGinley v. Hardy

California Supreme Court

McGinley v. Hardy

18 Cal. 115

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

‘Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Field, C. J. concurring.

We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Field, C. J. concurring.

We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.

Judgment affirmed.

McGinley v. Hardy, 18 Cal. 115 (Cal. 1861).

Pincite

18 Cal. 115 (McGinley v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related