McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.

111 F. App'x 703

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2004·No. No. 04-1415·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Chad McGilton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Appellees in McGilton’s tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., No. CA-02-117-5 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Chad McGilton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Appellees in McGilton’s tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., No. CA-02-117-5 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., 111 F. App'x 703 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

111 F. App'x 703 (McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.