McGill v. State

443 So. 2d 433, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McGill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1984·No. No. 82-1317·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for armed robbery. The evidence is sufficient. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). The court properly refused an instruction on circumstantial evidence. Miller v. State, 403 So.2d 1014, 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

The court erred in sentencing appellant to a minimum three year sentence because only his accomplice had a firearm. Earnest v. State, 351 So.2d 957 (Fla.1977); Hillman v. State, 410 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The court did not err in retaining jurisdiction over the first one-third of the sentence but even if he had there was no objection below and thus the question was not preserved for appellate review.

Conviction affirmed; portion of sentence reversed and case remanded for correction of sentence.

COBB, J., and DIAMANTIS, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGill v. State, 443 So. 2d 433, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

443 So. 2d 433 (McGill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hillman v. State
410 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Earnest v. State
351 So. 2d 957 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Miller v. State
403 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)