McGill v. Ryals

385 U.S. 19, 87 S. Ct. 212, 17 L. Ed. 2d 17, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 472
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 17, 1966·No. 381 M·Published·Cited by 42 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the case was not appropriate for a three-judge court.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that a three-judge court was properly convened and would affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGill v. Ryals, 385 U.S. 19, 87 S. Ct. 212, 17 L. Ed. 2d 17, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 472 (1966).

385 U.S. 19 (McGill v. Ryals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putter v. Montpelier Public School System
697 A.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1997)
Wilburn v. Dalton
832 F. Supp. 943 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Tucker v. Burford
603 F. Supp. 276 (N.D. Mississippi, 1985)
Marie Von Hoffburg v. Clifford Alexander, Etc.
615 F.2d 633 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Hart v. King
470 F. Supp. 1195 (D. Hawaii, 1979)
Callaway v. Stetson
448 F. Supp. 575 (N.D. Florida, 1978)
Griffin v. Burns
431 F. Supp. 1361 (D. Rhode Island, 1977)
Jones v. Watkins
422 F. Supp. 1268 (N.D. Georgia, 1976)
Rew v. Ward
402 F. Supp. 331 (D. New Mexico, 1975)
De Santiago Olmo v. Commanding Officer, Third U. S. Army
387 F. Supp. 224 (D. Puerto Rico, 1974)
Horn v. Schlesinger
384 F. Supp. 506 (E.D. Missouri, 1974)
James v. Humphreys County Board of Election Commissioners
384 F. Supp. 114 (N.D. Mississippi, 1974)
Hodges v. Callaway
499 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Grover William Sims v. Cecil E. Fox
492 F.2d 1088 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Betonie v. Sizemore
496 F.2d 1001 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Sims v. Fox
492 F.2d 1088 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)