McGill v. a & D Installations of Wellington, Inc.
15 So. 3d 31, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127, 2009 WL 1313196
This text of 15 So. 3d 31 (McGill v. a & D Installations of Wellington, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McGill v. a & D Installations of Wellington, Inc., 15 So. 3d 31, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127, 2009 WL 1313196 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
Appellant’s motion for certification is DENIED. The Judge of Compensation Claims is AFFIRMED. See Demedrano v. Labor Finders of the Treasure Coast & Amisure Ins., 8 So.3d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Demedrano v. Labor Finders of the Treasure Coast
8 So. 3d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 So. 3d 31, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5127, 2009 WL 1313196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgill-v-a-d-installations-of-wellington-inc-fladistctapp-2009.