McGiboney v. State

274 S.E.2d 667, 156 Ga. App. 222, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 3005
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 24, 1980·No. 60653·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

While serving two probated sentences for burglary and one probated sentence for driving a motor vehicle after having been declared an habitual violator, appellant was arrested again for driving a motor vehicle. For that violation of the conditions of appellant’s probation, the trial court revoked two and one-half years of probation. This appeal is from that judgment.

Appellant’s enumerations of error amount to an appeal on the general grounds and a contention that the “slight evidence” standard applicable to probation revocation hearings is a denial, of due process. Appellant’s assertion of the general grounds is clearly without merit in view of the confession he made in open court during the revocation hearing. The argument concerning the evidentiary standard applicable in probation revocation proceedings was not raised in any manner below and, therefore, presents no issue for review in this court. Leonard v. State, 146 Ga. App. 436 (1) (246 SE2d 450).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Carley, J., concur. *223 J. W. Morgan, District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGiboney v. State, 274 S.E.2d 667, 156 Ga. App. 222, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 3005 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

274 S.E.2d 667 (McGiboney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trice v. State
707 So. 2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Bridgers v. State
357 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Moore v. State
335 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)