McGhee v. State
This text of 149 So. 2d 5 (McGhee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced accordingly. He appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court and the State filed a petition for certiorari in this Court to review the opinion and judgment of the Court of Appeals.
. One Richard C. Harris was the victim of the robbery and the prosecuting witness. Harris testified that he had been a minister of the Gospel for several years. In the closing argument of the solicitor to the jury, the solicitor stated: “I know this man of God told you the truth, he is on God’s side, gentlemen, and God is on his”.
The majority opinion of the Court of Appeals (Judges Price and Cates) ruled the foregoing statement of the solicitor to be reversible error as being a statement of an outside fact not borne out by the evidence. Judge Johnson dissented, believing that the stated argument was within the limits of “reasonable and authorized inference from the evidence”; that the argument of the solicitor was within the limits of reasonable, forensic debate.
It results that the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 So. 2d 5, 274 Ala. 373, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcghee-v-state-ala-1963.