McGhee v. McGhee
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 451 (McGhee v. McGhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The receipt of Johnson and Jewell, written on the margin of the deed from L. W. McGhee to appellants, was, as between the parties to this suit, only a written statement of third parties, not verified in any form, necessary to render it competent as testimony in this case, and it was therefore properly rejected by the court.
Without elaboration or analysis of the facts on which the correctness of the judgment declaring said deed fraudulent and [452]*452invalid must depend, it is deemed sufficient to say that the preponderance of the evidence seems to us to sustain the conclusion of the circuit court.
The judgment is therefore affirmed. Judge Lindsay not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 451, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcghee-v-mcghee-kyctapp-1871.