McGhee v. Atterberry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

McGhee v. Atterberry

1912 OK 840, 128 P. 1095, 36 Okla. 320, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 874

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 7, 1912

Docket2055

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 840 (McGhee v. Atterberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGhee v. Atterberry, 1912 OK 840, 128 P. 1095, 36 Okla. 320, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 874 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was begun in the county court of Delaware county August 33, 1909, by Sam Atterberry, against. O. P. McGhee, for the sum of $J60, - alleged to be due on a contract. The cause was tried October,' 1909, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $160, with interest at 6 per cent, from June 39, 1909. From this judgment defendant,. Q, P. McGhee, appeals.

The petition in error and purported transcript of the record was filed October 11, 1910. , No brief was filed by either party until November 33, 1913, when brief was filed by plaintiff in error. However, the record shows no service of brief on defendant in error. As the case had been filed more than two years before briefs were filed by plaintiff in error, this court will not pass upon the' record in the absence of service of brief on defendant in errorj or stipulation or order of court that briefs may be filed out of tithe.

The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was begun in the county court of Delaware county August 33, 1909, by Sam Atterberry, against. O. P. McGhee, for the sum of $J60, - alleged to be due on a contract. The cause was tried October,' 1909, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $160, with interest at 6 per cent, from June 39, 1909. From this judgment defendant,. Q, P. McGhee, appeals.

The petition in error and purported transcript of the record was filed October 11, 1910. , No brief was filed by either party until November 33, 1913, when brief was filed by plaintiff in error. However, the record shows no service of brief on defendant in error. As the case had been filed more than two years before briefs were filed by plaintiff in error, this court will not pass upon the' record in the absence of service of brief on defendant in errorj or stipulation or order of court that briefs may be filed out of tithe.

The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 840, 128 P. 1095, 36 Okla. 320, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcghee-v-atterberry-okla-1912.