McGehee v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Georgia

McGehee v. Taylor

45 Ga. 116

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ga. 116 (McGehee v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGehee v. Taylor, 45 Ga. 116 (Ga. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery, Judge.

This was an action of trespass vi et armis by the defendant in error, against the plaintiffs in error, for blacking the face of the former The jury found a verdict in favor of plaintiff, for $500. A new trial was moved for, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and other grounds, but the one named is the only one insisted on here. The Court below overruled the motion, and plaintiffs in error excepted. We think the verdict is sufficiently sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery, Judge.

This was an action of trespass vi et armis by the defendant in error, against the plaintiffs in error, for blacking the face of the former The jury found a verdict in favor of plaintiff, for $500. A new trial was moved for, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and other grounds, but the one named is the only one insisted on here. The Court below overruled the motion, and plaintiffs in error excepted. We think the verdict is sufficiently sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Ga. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgehee-v-taylor-ga-1872.