McGehee v. Posey

42 Ala. 330
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The third section, 26th ordinance of the convention of 1865, has no relation to the [332] measure of damages in this case. The two subjects of regulation of the section are, the consideration and the currency in which contracts are to be paid. There is no question of consideration here, and no question as to the currency in which payment was to be made. The contract by its terms was payable in certain chattels; the value of which, at the time of delivery, is the measure of damages. — Rose v. Bozeman, 40 Ala. 678. We do not think either one of the charges asked should have been given. Scheible v. Bacho, 40 Ala. 423.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGehee v. Posey, 42 Ala. 330 (Ala. 1868).

42 Ala. 330 (McGehee v. Posey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trustees of Howard College v. Turner
71 Ala. 429 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)
Henry & Co. v. Northern Bank
63 Ala. 527 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Bozeman v. Rose's Executors
51 Ala. 321 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1874)