McGee v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McGee v. State

111 S.E. 79, 28 Ga. App. 227, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 405

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 1922

Docket13155

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 79 (McGee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGee v. State, 111 S.E. 79, 28 Ga. App. 227, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the defendant’s

motion for a eonjjnuance of the ease. The ground of the motion was the absence of three material witnesses for the defense, and upon the hearing of the motion it was shown that none of these witnesses had been subpoenaed, and the defendant did not state that he expected to have their testimony at the next'term of the court.

2. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI