McGee v. State

903 So. 2d 1041, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9380, 2005 WL 1412095
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 17, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-2654
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 903 So. 2d 1041 (McGee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGee v. State, 903 So. 2d 1041, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9380, 2005 WL 1412095 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORFINGER, J.

We affirm James McGee’s convictions of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Although no weapon or firearm was recovered, and, consequently, none was introduced as evidence at trial, sufficient testimony was presented from which the jury could reasonably conclude that McGee possessed a firearm during the commission of these offenses. Flowers v. State, 738 So.2d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Butler v. State, 602 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J. and PLEUS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shane Kopp v. The State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 So. 2d 1041, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9380, 2005 WL 1412095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgee-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.