McGee v. State

657 So. 2d 1289, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252, 1995 WL 457073
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 1995
DocketNo. 95-513
StatusPublished

This text of 657 So. 2d 1289 (McGee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGee v. State, 657 So. 2d 1289, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252, 1995 WL 457073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record of the oral pronouncement of sentence reflects two years of probation; the written sentence reflects three years. The state concedes there is a discrepancy. We accordingly vacate the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkins v. State
543 So. 2d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 So. 2d 1289, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252, 1995 WL 457073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgee-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.