McGee v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

McGee v. State

102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 687

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 1925

Docket6 Div. 549.

StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 923 (McGee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGee v. State, 102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There are many questions presented by this record, which will probably not arise on another trial, and the other questions have so many times been passed on by this court and the Supreme Court that a discussion of them would be but a reiteration of principles many times decided. There is one question presented which entitles the defendant to a reversal. The solicitor, during his argument to the jury, said: “The defendant was down there that day with a belly full of liquor and a gun, and did just what a man with a belly full of liquor and a gun would do.” There was no evidence in the record to bear out this statement. On the contrary, the testimony of the witness, of whom inquiry as to this fact was made, was: “If he was [drunk], I couldn’t tell it; never .smelled it; could not detect it in his conversation.” Certainly it was error for the solicitor to go outside the record to make a statement of a fact not testified to by any witness. This case is reversed, on authority of Naro v. State, 209 Ala. 614, 96 So. 761. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There are many questions presented by this record, which will probably not arise on another trial, and the other questions have so many times been passed on by this court and the Supreme Court that a discussion of them would be but a reiteration of principles many times decided. There is one question presented which entitles the defendant to a reversal. The solicitor, during his argument to the jury, said: “The defendant was down there that day with a belly full of liquor and a gun, and did just what a man with a belly full of liquor and a gun would do.” There was no evidence in the record to bear out this statement. On the contrary, the testimony of the witness, of whom inquiry as to this fact was made, was: “If he was [drunk], I couldn’t tell it; never .smelled it; could not detect it in his conversation.” Certainly it was error for the solicitor to go outside the record to make a statement of a fact not testified to by any witness. This case is reversed, on authority of Naro v. State, 209 Ala. 614, 96 So. 761. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgee-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack