McGee v. Reno

Fourth Circuit

McGee v. Reno

13 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2001·No. No. 01-1183·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael H. McGee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McGee v. Reno, No. CA-00-452-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 5 & Feb. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael H. McGee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McGee v. Reno, No. CA-00-452-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 5 & Feb. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McGee v. Reno, 13 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

13 F. App'x 196 (McGee v. Reno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.