McGee v. Jones

63 Miss. 453
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Coopee, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We can perceive no reason why a different rule should apply to bills of exception taken to the action of a board of supervisors than that which was announced in the ease of Savings Bank v. Johnson, 56 Miss. 125, in reference to those taken in the circuit courts, viz.: that they must be taken during the term unless by consent of parties, or under an order of the court, to be evidenced by the record proper or by a recital in the bill itself, the time, for presenting it is extended into the following vacation. The bill in this case was not taken during the term nor was there any permission of the court or consent of parties that it might be taken in vacation.

The appeal was, therefore, properly dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGee v. Jones, 63 Miss. 453 (Mich. 1886).

63 Miss. 453 (McGee v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowling v. Madison County Bd. of Sup'rs
724 So. 2d 431 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 1998)
Cloverleaf Mall, Ltd. v. Conerly
387 So. 2d 736 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
Board of Supervisors v. Stephenson
134 So. 142 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Hathorn v. Morgan
66 So. 643 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)