McGee v. Hardacre

125 S.E. 383, 33 Ga. App. 43, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 702
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1924
Docket15763
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 383 (McGee v. Hardacre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGee v. Hardacre, 125 S.E. 383, 33 Ga. App. 43, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

When this ease was here before (27 Ga. App. 106) the judgment sustaining a general demurrer was reversed because of the amendment referred to in the fourth division of the opinion. Upon the trial of the case the evidence for the plaintiff did not prove the case as laid in the petition as amended. The court therefore properly granted a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 383, 33 Ga. App. 43, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgee-v-hardacre-gactapp-1924.