McGee v. Doyle

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 24, 2025·No. 7:24-cv-04772·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RONDELL McGEE,

Plaintiff, ORDER

-against- 7:24-CV-4772 (PMH) P.O. TERRENC DOYLE, et al.,

Defendants. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: On June 20, 2024, Rondell McGee (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action against members of the Yonkers Police Department: (1) Police Officer “Terrenc” Doyle; (2) Police Officer Shaban Khan (or Khan Shaban); (3) Police Officer Nee Lauren (or Lauren Nee); (4) Police Officer Mark Mendelson; and (5) Police Officer “Doe” Spano. (Doc. 1). On August 26, 2024, the Court issued an Order that directed service on the defendants and dismissed Plaintiff’s claims for Section 2241 habeas corpus relief without prejudice. (Doc. 10). On August 29, 2024, summonses were issued and an information package was mailed to Plaintiff. (Doc. 12; Doc. 13). On October 25, 2024, executed Marshal’s Process Receipts and Returns of Service were filed, indicating that each defendant was served on October 24, 2024. (Doc. 14—Doc. 18). No defendant has appeared or answered to date. A default may entered by the Clerk when a defendant fails to answer a complaint. The party seeking default judgment must adhere to the two-step process outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. First, pursuant to Rule 55(a), a party must obtain from the Clerk of the Court an entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). If, like here, “plaintiff's claim[s are not] for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation . . . the party must apply to the court for a default judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). The “district court has discretion under Rule 55(b)(2) once a default is determined to require proof of necessary facts and need not agree that the alleged facts constitute a valid cause of action.” Au Bon Pain Corp. v. Artect, Inc., 653 F.2d 61, 65 (2d Cir. 1981). The Court likewise does not accept blindly the allegations concerning damages. See Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Flaks v. Koegel, 504 F.2d 702, 707

(2d Cir. 1974)). While an evidentiary hearing under Rule 55(b)(2) is not required, a plaintiff must establish through affidavits or other evidence “a basis for the damages specified in the default judgment.” Transatl. Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 111 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff, therefore, is directed to seek a Clerk’s Certificate of Default as to each of the defendants who have been properly served and have not appeared or answered the complaint in this action. Plaintiff is directed to obtain Clerk’s Certificates of Default by March 28, 2025. Plaintiff is advised that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic available to assist self-represented parties in civil cases. The Clinic may be able to provide a pro se party with advice in connection with their case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a private organization called the City Bar Justice

Center; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any self-represented party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). Litigants in need of legal assistance should complete the City Bar Justice Center’s intake form to make an appointment. If a litigant has questions about the intake form or needs to highlight an urgent deadline already disclosed in the form, the clinic can be contacted by phone (212-382-4794) or email (fedprosdny@nycbar.org). The City Bar Justice Center’s retainer forms are attached to this Order. Plaintiff is reminded that he must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss this action if he fails to do so. Plaintiff is further reminded that failure to comply with the Court’s orders may likewise result in dismissal of this action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff; and to mail a copy of this Order to Yonkers Police Department Fourth Precinct, 53 Shonnard Place, Yonkers, New York 10701.

SO ORDERED. Dated: White Plains, New York (orm February 24, 2025 PHILIPM.HALPERN = =————<“—i— United States District Judge

Court was advised on February 14, 2025 that Plaintiff’s address had changed and accordingly, the docket was updated to reflect Plaintiff’s new address.

1-9 ee od Oy ms 1 O7-) ee-NS) oe =) Len] SINT BA 1 1 Uae □□ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ DIcid alenmeym (-\)\'m dela. a DIN RO rNEU □□

ABOUT THE PROJECT The Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project provides limited assistance to self- represented litigants (plaintiffs and defendants) with cases involving civil legal matters in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). This project assists plaintiffs and defendants on a variety of federal legal issues, including, among others, civil rights, employment discrimination, and disability discrimination. The team also assists incarcerated individuals with civil (non- criminal) claims. HOW WE HELP Fed Pro provides limited assistance through full-time attorneys, legal support team members, pro bono (volunteer) attorneys, law school/college interns, anda social work team. While we cannot provide full representation, Fed Pro can assist litigants by providing limited-scope services such as:

& Counseling about potential Consulting on discovery federal claims prior to filing suit &R matters Interpreting and explaining ga) Assisting with the settlement federal law and procedure S6-~—SCsprocesss (including mediation) Reviewing drafted pleadings and correspondence with the Court

HOW TO ACCESS OUR SERVICES

ake) a STEa alec 0) K=t-Fevomeced nn} e) [-iaoihd atom eal tial ce) mim leler-ta-te| folamele) an c=) □□□ □□□□ — ahaa PAWAWAY el he'd Ulta □□ -Le-] ald] ate) ©) □□□ s-yh ee □□□□□□ a! jo) □□ bast ta (4-4-1 e039 (oa | ete 0) □□ □□ es hmm 2el0mr-] ale) ae: □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ce) a iapme) an 2e)0mal-hYi— — (olUr spa fe) atom) oleh □□ mal-Mce) sri Pee) (-t-1-eot- 1 ae Pe

CITY BAR CITY BAR JUSTICE CENTER JUSTICE CENTER SDNY Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project es

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGee v. Doyle, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

McGee v. Doyle (McGee v. Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related