McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections

Louisiana Court of Appeal

McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections

330 So. 2d 391, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4642

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 7, 1976

DocketNo. 5505

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 So. 2d 391 (McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGee v. Board of Supervisors of Elections, 330 So. 2d 391, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4642 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an election contest instituted under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420. That statute provides that when an appeal is taken in such a case the appellate court will decide the issue within 24 hours after submission. LSA-R.S. 18:420E.

After considering the facts, the law and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that there is rio error in the judgment rendered by the trial court.

In view of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420E, we have decided to render judgment at this time affirming the judgment appealed from. Reasons for that judgment will be assigned at a later date.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to defendant, Conrad Fuselier.

[392]*392HOOD, Judge.

For the reasons which we are assigning today in Roger Dale McGee v. Conrad Fuselier et al., 330 So.2d 383 (No. 5506 on our docket), we hereby confirm the judgment which we rendered in the instant suit on April 7, 1976. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant, Conrad Fuselier.

AFFIRMED.

DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs m the decree.

WATSON, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI