McGee, Ex Parte Larry James

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2012
DocketAP-76,922
StatusPublished

This text of McGee, Ex Parte Larry James (McGee, Ex Parte Larry James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGee, Ex Parte Larry James, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,922
EX PARTE LARRY JAMES MCGEE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 3611-B IN THE 100TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM CARSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of marihuana and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McGee v. State, No. 07-08-00211-CR (Tex. App. - Amarillo, March 6, 2009).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-08-00211-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 3611-B from the 100th District Court of Carson County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: November 21, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McGee, Ex Parte Larry James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgee-ex-parte-larry-james-texcrimapp-2012.