McGean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
This text of 15 N.Y.S. 114 (McGean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The findings at folios 87 and 104 are so nant to each other as to evidence an oversight on the part of the trial judge, to which his attention should be called before a decision of the appeal. Pappenheim v. Railway Co., 7 N. Y. Supp. 679. The matter will therefore be remanded to the trial judge for such action as he deems proper, (see Bohlen v. Railway Co., 121 N. Y. 546, 24 N. E. Rep. 932;) and the decision of the appeal will be reserved until the action of the trial judge is officially made known to the general term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y.S. 114, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgean-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-co-superctny-1891.