McGean v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

McGean v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 4, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (McGean v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGean v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The findings at fols. 87 and 104 are so manifestly repugnant to each other as to evidence an oversight on the part of the trial judge to which his attention should be called before a decision of the appeal. 57 N. Y. Supr. Ct., 281; 28 N. Y. State Rep., 577. The matter will, therefore, be remanded to the trial judge for such action as he deems proper (see 121 N. Y., 546; 31 N. Y. State Rep., 888), and the decision of the appeal will be reserved until the action of the trial judge is officially made known to the general term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The findings at fols. 87 and 104 are so manifestly repugnant to each other as to evidence an oversight on the part of the trial judge to which his attention should be called before a decision of the appeal. 57 N. Y. Supr. Ct., 281; 28 N. Y. State Rep., 577. The matter will, therefore, be remanded to the trial judge for such action as he deems proper (see 121 N. Y., 546; 31 N. Y. State Rep., 888), and the decision of the appeal will be reserved until the action of the trial judge is officially made known to the general term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgean-v-metropolitan-el-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack