McGaugh v. Holliday

142 Ala. 185
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1904·Published

Opinion

McOLELLAN, C. J.

This is an (attempted) appeal from a decree overruling a motion to dismiss a cross bill for want of equity. The appeal is not authorized by statute. There is a statute authorizing an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling a motion to dismiss a till for want of equity, (Code, § 427); but there is no statute providing for appeal from such decree in respect of a cross'bill. The appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Tyson, Simpson and Anderson, J.J., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGaugh v. Holliday, 142 Ala. 185 (Ala. 1904).

142 Ala. 185 (McGaugh v. Holliday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.