McGary v. McBath
This text of 177 F. App'x 632 (McGary v. McBath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Washington state civil detainee Darnell Otis McGary appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various Washington state employees conspired to violate his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed McGary’s action as frivolous because his amended complaint lacked an arguable basis in either fact or law. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgary-v-mcbath-ca9-2006.