McGary v. Johnson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 9, 2009
• Docket: 08-7632
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7632

REGINALD A. MCGARY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON; BRYAN WATSON; DOCTOR LEE; DOCTOR THOMPSON; M. STANFORD; LAILA HOLMES; JANE & JOHN DOES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00418-jct-mfu)

Submitted: February 12, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald A. McGary, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald A. McGary appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006), for failure to state a claim and

the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. McGary v. Johnson,

No. 7:08-cv-00418-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008; Aug. 8,

2008). We deny McGary’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED