McGary, Ex Parte David T. A/K/A David Sanders

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 30, 2010
DocketAP-76,368
StatusPublished

This text of McGary, Ex Parte David T. A/K/A David Sanders (McGary, Ex Parte David T. A/K/A David Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGary, Ex Parte David T. A/K/A David Sanders, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,368




EX PARTE DAVID T. MCGARY, AKA DAVID SANDERS, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 4006 IN THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARDEMAN COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. McGary v. State, No. 07-07-00503-CR (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2008, no pet.).

            Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to advise Applicant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. On August 19, 2009, we remanded this application and directed the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law and to order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. On February 3, 2010, we remanded this application again and directed the trial court to make further findings and conclusions as to whether appellate counsel timely notified Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. We also directed the trial court to order appellate counsel to file a second response and explain whether he timely advised Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed.

            On the second remand, appellate counsel did not file a response. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-07-00503-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 4006 from the 46th Judicial District Court of Hardeman County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Seventh Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: June 30, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McGary, Ex Parte David T. A/K/A David Sanders, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgary-ex-parte-david-t-aka-david-sanders-texcrimapp-2010.