Mcgarry Vs. Batista

481 P.3d 878
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 2021
Docket82145
StatusPublished

This text of 481 P.3d 878 (Mcgarry Vs. Batista) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mcgarry Vs. Batista, 481 P.3d 878 (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LESLIE MCGARRY; AND MARK No. 82145 MCGARRY, Appellants, vs. FILED LAURA MCGARRY ROCHA BATISTA; MARCELO BATISTA; EDGAR MAR 1 0 2021 MOLLINEDA, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK g VPR.EME COURT Res iondents. BY DE15.1;TY atR C ' Irtilf

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Cause appearing, appellants motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROw i ze

BY: d

cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Gallagher Attorney Group, LLC Edgar Mollineda Green Valley Law Group, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

101.1947 0fi-0(092A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 P.3d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgarry-vs-batista-nev-2021.