McGarrity v. McMahon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McGarrity v. McMahon

87 A. 781, 240 Pa. 553, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 714

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 5, 1913

DocketAppeal, No. 399

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 A. 781 (McGarrity v. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGarrity v. McMahon, 87 A. 781, 240 Pa. 553, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 714 (Pa. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

While the court below gave no reason for refusing fo open the judgment against the appellant, it is safe to assume that her petition was dismissed because it appeared from the depositions that she had given her obligation to the appellee as an original undertaking on her part, for a valuable consideration passing directly to her, and not for an antecedent debt of her husband. It is for this reason that the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

While the court below gave no reason for refusing fo open the judgment against the appellant, it is safe to assume that her petition was dismissed because it appeared from the depositions that she had given her obligation to the appellee as an original undertaking on her part, for a valuable consideration passing directly to her, and not for an antecedent debt of her husband. It is for this reason that the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A. 781, 240 Pa. 553, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgarrity-v-mcmahon-pa-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack