McGarity v. J. B. Ivey & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

McGarity v. J. B. Ivey & Co.

172 S.E. 926, 205 N.C. 839, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 622

DecidedDecember 13, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 172 S.E. 926 (McGarity v. J. B. Ivey & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGarity v. J. B. Ivey & Co., 172 S.E. 926, 205 N.C. 839, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 622 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

*840 Pee Curiam.

The case was tried below and argued here by counsel with their accustomed zeal and earnestness. Nothing seems to have been overlooked or omitted which would have benefited either side, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The jury has responded in favor of the defendant on a sharply controverted issue of fact. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*840 Pee Curiam.

The case was tried below and argued here by counsel with their accustomed zeal and earnestness. Nothing seems to have been overlooked or omitted which would have benefited either side, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The jury has responded in favor of the defendant on a sharply controverted issue of fact. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 S.E. 926, 205 N.C. 839, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgarity-v-j-b-ivey-co-nc-1933.