McGann v. Drennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McGann v. Drennan

252 A.D. 863, 299 N.Y.S. 480, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 863 (McGann v. Drennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGann v. Drennan, 252 A.D. 863, 299 N.Y.S. 480, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the defendants, judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was not inadequate in amount. The charge with respect to the failure to call Dr, Silverman as a witness was incorrect; but in view of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and of our conclusion that the amount was not inadequate, we may, under section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, disregard the error. Appeal from order denying motion to set aside the verdict dismissed. There is no such order in the record. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the defendants, judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was not inadequate in amount. The charge with respect to the failure to call Dr, Silverman as a witness was incorrect; but in view of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and of our conclusion that the amount was not inadequate, we may, under section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, disregard the error. Appeal from order denying motion to set aside the verdict dismissed. There is no such order in the record. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 863, 299 N.Y.S. 480, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgann-v-drennan-nyappdiv-1937.