McGahey v. McGraw
56 So. 397, 100 Miss. 295
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The burden of proof was upon the plaintiff in the court below to show that the articles, purchased by the husband, were for the use and benefit of the business transacted by him with his wife’s property. Porter & McRae v. Staten, 64 Miss. 428, 1 South. 487. This burden he wholly failed to meet.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGahey v. McGraw, 56 So. 397, 100 Miss. 295 (Mich. 1911).
56 So. 397 (McGahey v. McGraw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. W. S. Buck Mercantile Co.
264 P. 1023 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1928)