McGahee v. United States

163 F.2d 875, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2348
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 24, 1947·No. No. 11950·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It will serve no useful purpose to set out the facts of the case or to canvass appellant’s contentions with respect to them, for it is quite plain that appellant had not exhausted his administrative remedies and was not entitled to interpose the defense of wrongful classification, Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549, 64 S.Ct. 346, 88 L.Ed. 305. United States v. Balogh, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 999, is a case directly in point. In addition, if we should hold that he had put himself in a position to make the defense, it is quite plain, under Lemien v. United States, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 550, and Wells v. United States, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 932, that none of his points are well taken.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGahee v. United States, 163 F.2d 875, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2348 (5th Cir. 1947).

163 F.2d 875 (McGahee v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Burns
296 F. Supp. 162 (D. Colorado, 1969)
James Edward Barnes v. United States
387 F.2d 649 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Bryan
263 F. Supp. 895 (N.D. Georgia, 1967)