McGahee v. United States
This text of 163 F.2d 875 (McGahee v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It will serve no useful purpose to set out the facts of the case or to canvass appellant’s contentions with respect to them, for it is quite plain that appellant had not exhausted his administrative remedies and was not entitled to interpose the defense of wrongful classification, Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549, 64 S.Ct. 346, 88 L.Ed. 305. United States v. Balogh, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 999, is a case directly in point. In addition, if we should hold that he had put himself in a position to make the defense, it is quite plain, under Lemien v. United States, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 550, and Wells v. United States, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 932, that none of his points are well taken.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F.2d 875, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgahee-v-united-states-ca5-1947.