McGaha v. Young
This text of McGaha v. Young (McGaha v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6485
ANTHONY CHARLES MCGAHA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
S. K. YOUNG, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-238-3)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 7, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Charles McGaha, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Anthony Charles McGaha seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §
2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) and denying reconsideration of that
order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See McGaha v. Young, No. CA-01-
238-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 & Mar. 15, 2002). We also deny McGaha leave
to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McGaha v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgaha-v-young-ca4-2002.