McFerran v. Board of Education

380 N.E.2d 301, 45 N.Y.2d 729, 408 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2187
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1978·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Having instituted an action in Federal court based on a distinct Federal cause of action, it was necessary for that court to determine the validity of the agreement which petitioner now attacks in this subsequent proceeding. That prior action fully embraced those claims which petitioner now seeks to litigate in the courts of this State and settled principles of res judicata bar petitioner from raising those matters here (Israel v Wood Dolson Co., 1 NY2d 116, 118; Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 NY 304, 306-307; Stoner v Culligan, Inc., 32 AD2d 170, 171-172).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFerran v. Board of Education, 380 N.E.2d 301, 45 N.Y.2d 729, 408 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2187 (N.Y. 1978).

380 N.E.2d 301 (McFerran v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mazurkiewicz v. NY CITY HEALTH & HOSP.
585 F. Supp. 2d 491 (S.D. New York, 2008)
McFerran v. Board of Education
130 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)