McFee v. Harris
This text of 25 Pa. 102 (McFee v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The second error is to the rejection of evidence; but no bill of exceptions is to be found in the paper-book. It is a waste of time to assign errors without verifying them by the record.
[105]*105Both parties claim under sheriffs’ sales by virtue of executions against John McFee. The question is whether the youngest or] the oldest sale passes the title. The Court below decided in favom* of the oldest sale. This was correct. The sheriff had authority to sell, and there is no evidence of fraud in the case. After acknowledgment of the sheriff’s deed in open Court, the title of the sheriff’s vendee cannot be affected by mere irregularities however gross. Nothing but fraud in the sale, or a want of authority to sell, can defeat his title: 2 Harris 79.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Pa. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfee-v-harris-pa-1855.