McFarlin v. State
363 So. 2d 405
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1978·No. No. GG-475·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s appeal on the merits has been considered and is found to be without merit. The judgment is AFFIRMED. The sentence is technically defective because it does not specify the number of days of credit against the sentence for time served prior to sentencing. The sentence is VACATED and the case REMANDED for resentenc-ing. Appellant need not be present.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McFarlin v. State, 363 So. 2d 405 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
363 So. 2d 405 (McFarlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tascano v. State
363 So. 2d 405 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)