McFarlin v. Breves

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McFarlin v. Breves

73 S.E. 862, 10 Ga. App. 581, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 619

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 26, 1912

Docket3509

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 862 (McFarlin v. Breves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFarlin v. Breves, 73 S.E. 862, 10 Ga. App. 581, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. There was no motion to dismiss the levy of the mortgage fi. fa. upon the ground that the justice of the peace had not notified the mortgagor at the time of issuing the execution upon the affidavit of foreclosure, and, in the absence of' an appropriate request,‘the judge did not err in failing to charge the jury that it was the duty of the magistrate, with whom the mortgage and affidavit to foreclose it were filed, to give notice to the mortgagor of the proceedings to foreclose, at the time of issuing the execution, and that if the proof showed that he failed to do this, the jury should find for the plaintiff. 3STor did the court err in overruling the objection to the mortgage fi. fa., based upon the ground that it did not show that the justice of the peace had given notice to the defendant in fi. fa. as required by law.

2. It is optional to take either the exemption provided by § 3416, or the exemption declared in § 3414, of the Civil Code (1910), but one can not take both the exemptions. Civil Code (1910), § 6585.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. There was no motion to dismiss the levy of the mortgage fi. fa. upon the ground that the justice of the peace had not notified the mortgagor at the time of issuing the execution upon the affidavit of foreclosure, and, in the absence of' an appropriate request,‘the judge did not err in failing to charge the jury that it was the duty of the magistrate, with whom the mortgage and affidavit to foreclose it were filed, to give notice to the mortgagor of the proceedings to foreclose, at the time of issuing the execution, and that if the proof showed that he failed to do this, the jury should find for the plaintiff. 3STor did the court err in overruling the objection to the mortgage fi. fa., based upon the ground that it did not show that the justice of the peace had given notice to the defendant in fi. fa. as required by law.

2. It is optional to take either the exemption provided by § 3416, or the exemption declared in § 3414, of the Civil Code (1910), but one can not take both the exemptions. Civil Code (1910), § 6585.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 862, 10 Ga. App. 581, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarlin-v-breves-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack