McFarlane v. State
This text of 957 So. 2d 714 (McFarlane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Milton McFARLANE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Kirk A. Barrow, Ft. Lauderdale, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GREEN and WELLS, JJ. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying defendant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion to correct sentence insofar as it addressed defendant's first four claims. We reverse insofar as the order fails to address defendant's fifth claim. We remand for consideration of that claim.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
957 So. 2d 714, 2007 WL 1610152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarlane-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.