McFarlane v. McFarlane

Court of Appeals of Oregon

McFarlane v. McFarlane

488 P.2d 1206, 7 Or. App. 1, 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 505

DecidedOctober 4, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 488 P.2d 1206 (McFarlane v. McFarlane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFarlane v. McFarlane, 488 P.2d 1206, 7 Or. App. 1, 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 505 (Or. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant father filed a motion and affidavit seeking a reduction in support payments on behalf of one child from $105 per month to $50 per month. The court found a change of circumstances justified a reduction to $85 per month, and so ordered.

From that order the plaintiff mother, who has custody of the child, appeals, seeking reinstatement of $105 per month support money. We agree with the trial judge.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant father filed a motion and affidavit seeking a reduction in support payments on behalf of one child from $105 per month to $50 per month. The court found a change of circumstances justified a reduction to $85 per month, and so ordered.

From that order the plaintiff mother, who has custody of the child, appeals, seeking reinstatement of $105 per month support money. We agree with the trial judge.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 P.2d 1206, 7 Or. App. 1, 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarlane-v-mcfarlane-orctapp-1971.