McFarland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McFarland v. State

1912 OK CR 312, 122 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 723, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 7, 1912·No. No. A-1009.·Published

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

Appellant was convicted in ■ the county court of DeFlore county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days’ imprisonment in the county jail. .We have carefully examined the brief of counsel and find that the questions of law therein presented ■ have repeatedly been passed upon adversely to the contention made in behalf of appellant. It is therefore unneessary for us to go over these questions again. The evidence amply sustains the verdict. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, P. J.

Appellant was convicted in ■ the county court of DeFlore county for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days’ imprisonment in the county jail. .We have carefully examined the brief of counsel and find that the questions of law therein presented ■ have repeatedly been passed upon adversely to the contention made in behalf of appellant. It is therefore unneessary for us to go over these questions again. The evidence amply sustains the verdict. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

McFarland v. State, 1912 OK CR 312, 122 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 723, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 312 (McFarland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.